Friday, July 12, 2013

The Relay Race of Life

I recently read this excerpt from a Utah newspaper:
            “As the Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Utah, I am joyful that the United States Supreme Court has ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act and its discrimination against same-sex marriage is unconstitutional,” said the Right Reverend Scott B. Hayashi, Episcopal Bishop of Utah. “Gay and lesbian people are members of our families, congregations and communities. They raise children, celebrate birthdays, anniversaries and holidays. They rent apartments, own homes and pay taxes. They contribute and support the well-being of our state and country. They are people who are made in the image of God. I will continue to welcome them into The Episcopal Church.
            “I am well aware that others believe that the action of the Supreme Court is wrong,” Bishop Hayashi continued. “For these people these decisions are a cause for upset, unhappiness and frustration. My happiness is tempered with this knowledge. Understanding, compassion and prayer for people who deplore this decision is important. They are also made in the image of God. I will be offering my prayers for them and I will continue to welcome them into The Episcopal Church.”
Bishop Hayashi concluded that “all of us can work to make the state of Utah into the place where all people are brought together, where each person is treated with dignity and respect, and where God is seen in the face of each and every person.”
           Tears streamed down my face as I read this and I couldn’t help but wish that I worshipped in this particular congregation.  What kind of man can have that much love for both the LGBT community and the people who oppose gay marriage?
           As I have sought to look through the lens of someone who is gay my feelings on this subject have changed.  I used to debate the issues that surround homosexuality: Are they born that way or not, is it something they choose, is it a sin?  Those things seem inconsequential to me now.  I was not born with that experience and I will never know the answers.  But I was also born with experiences that are misunderstood by people who don’t share my experience.  I have felt unwelcome among people who should have been my friends.  I have also heard people say that the path I am choosing is a sin, that I’m on a slippery slope to hell, that my experience is counterfeit.  My problem is an insatiable desire for satisfying answers.  I need logic and spirit and context and reality and faith to all mesh into one beautiful whole.   
           I can’t accept that I or my religion have all the answers.  It is a vast and beautiful world out there and truth exists everywhere.  It exists in every religion, culture, work of art, and life experience.  It exists among LGBT members who are discovering that their bodies work differently than others.  It exists among conservatives who have a great love for God and want to do His will.  It exists among liberals who have an incredible capacity to love others who are different. 
            Life is an individual journey that we need to discover for ourselves with God.  We each have that capacity.  I have absolute faith in an individual’s ability to discover his/her own purpose in life and create beauty and goodness.  The older I get, the less use I see in the arbitrary lines that guide us all along a well-paved, well-beaten path.  We may all have the same end goal: happiness, love, a fulfilling life.  But we are all different and a path that makes me happy won’t necessarily make someone else happy.
            I just ran a Ragnar relay and at 2am as I ran through a dark mountain pass, I reveled in the relationship I had with the road I was running on.  This was my stretch of road to run.  I felt the curves and climbs, my legs ached with exertion.  The road was shaping me.  I had a living relationship with it.  My team was leap frogging me: stopping up ahead to cheer me on and make sure that I was okay, then driving further up to wait for me once I passed them.  It occurred to me that theirs seemed to be the better means of transportation along this road.  They were warm and comfortable, and they could move along a lot faster than me.  They didn’t have to struggle with the same path I was struggling with.  Part of me longed for the comfort of the car.  But I also realized that when I was in the car, and my fellow teammates came back gasping for air, the first thing they did was to tell us every detail of their experience along the road.  They had had a relationship with that stretch of road that we couldn’t have.  They felt the pressure from the hills, knew what it was like to stumble on rocks and dirt, felt the wind in their faces, felt the lonesomeness of a dark road with no one else around, felt the lifting of their spirits when they passed our van and heard our cheers. 
            Those of us who were in the car didn’t look down on our runners and say, “Your experience is invalid because it’s different from ours.”  We cheered them on.  We supported them in whatever way we could think of to support them.  We gave them water and told them how much longer they had to run.  We couldn’t take the burden or the experience from them, but we could sympathize with them because we had been down other stretches of road as runners.  It was pointless to say the legs I ran were better or harder or more worthwhile than my teammate’s legs because comparison was worthless.  I would never know my teammates legs and they would never know mine.  But we supported each other anyway and shared a communal sense of love, support, and teamwork.   
            How wonderful would it be if life could be like a Ragnar relay.  I don’t just mean that it would be great if life had room for all the crazy people that think it is fun to run for 30 hours with barely any sleep, although that would be great too.  How wonderful it would be if we could support our fellow teammates and trust that what they are feeling and experiencing is legitimate.  What if instead of telling them that the way they are travelling on their path is wrong because our means of transportation seems better, we accept that they are forming a relationship with a life experience that we can never know or fully understand?  What if we remember that we are all runners and will all have our turn?  What if we realize that what we really need is love, encouragement, and maybe sometimes a little help to see what is up ahead?
            I recently left a well-paved, well beaten path that I was on.  It was scary to leave, and the further away from that path I got, the scarier and lonelier it became.  It was of course my path to run alone.  But what I really wanted was support from others.  I wanted someone to cheer me on and give me water and say, “You’re doing great.  It’s hard, but you’ll make it.”  I needed someone to say, “It’s okay that we have different experiences in life.  I can’t fully understand your experience and you can’t understand mine.  But I love you…not in the loving you back into the fold kind of way.  Just loving you and learning from you and being grateful that God gives us different experiences so that love can truly abound.”
            So that is what I say to members of the LGBT community.  I don’t understand your experience, but I am trying to understand you.  And I love you.  I love that you are experiencing what you are experiencing and trying to understand the body you inhabit.  I hope that you find more love and acceptance in the world.  I love that there are people in the world like Bishop Hayashi who aren’t bound by arbitrary lines that force his allegiance to one side or the other.   I am happy to know that there are people who can rise above these lines and purely love both sides. We need each member of our team.  Life is a relay and when we work together, we’ll get to the finish line.

19 comments:

  1. Beautiful Jenny! My sentiments exactly! It can be difficult to find a forum for discussing this in a way that produces love, not anger/hate, understanding, not intolerance. I appreciate that your putting this blog out there and look forward to reading/discussing more!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Stephani. I am excited to have some good discussions too!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Shannon thank you for your comment. I appreciate your perspective. I have been thinking about it and trying to figure out the words for my thoughts. Kim expressed them very nicely. I know how hard it is to love and appreciate people who misunderstand the path you are on and are hurtful to you. But I also realize that love can do more to move people in a positive direction than hate, frustration, or impatience ever will. People are not sedentary beings. We are constantly changing and evolving. I have learned lately not to underestimate a persons capacity to understand or to evolve in a forward direction. I think Kim is right that if someone goes the wrong way, that is still part of their individual journey in life and hopefully they will find their way back. As a society, those wrong paths individually can hurt us all. Going back to my Ragnar analogy, I almost did that exact thing. I came to a turn and saw two ragnar signs. One said turn right and the other said turn left. The people who set up the course had made a mistake. It was the middle of the night and there was no one around. I had no idea what to do. Choosing the wrong path would hurt my team's scores. I'm sure I would figure it out eventually when I didn't see my team van pass me, but it would have been a long painful path back to the course. Staying where I was at until my van passed would also hurt my team's scores. Luckily I chose the right path and I was so happy when I finally saw my van pass. I think topics like gay marriage can be like that for people. I can have compassion for the pain and confusion that it causes people. Their pain is just as real as yours. I can also have compassion for people who are headed in the wrong direction with any decision in life because I know the pain of having to redirect your course. Mistakes are a frustrating, but necessary part of life. One more analogy: When I got to the end of my night run, the other van was not there yet and I had no one left to pass the baton on to. That was disheartening, after working so hard to get up those hills without walking. Our van blamed the other van and they blamed us and there was a lot of frustration on both sides. That made me realize that mistakes will always be made in life. It's so easy to group a bunch of people together and blame it on them: It's all because of the conservatives, or the liberals, or the rednecks, or the evangelicals...but in the end, we just have to move forward and keep working together. The evangelicals are part of our team too. While we were frustrated with our other van for dropping the ball, I wouldn't have wanted to do the race without them. I would have had to run twice as long if they hadn't taken their legs. So in some ways, you can be grateful for the Evangelical's journey, simply because you don't have to run that leg of the race.

    ReplyDelete
  4. yes i know those are incomplete sentences. gotta represent!

    ReplyDelete
  5. while we are at it lets shake things up a little bit. Thoughts on polygamy, should it be illegal? should it be legal? and why?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good point Ryan. That is why I have a problem with labeling and grouping people together. I wouldn't even group you with rednecks because I know you as an individual. I am actually working on a blog pot about that very subject. I have some thoughts on your polygamy question, but I need some more time to put it into words. I'll get back to you. Unless someone else wants to respond in the meantime.

    ReplyDelete
  7. found this little nugget. I have some gay friends and I love them dearly but this and stuff like this happening yes it even harms me and those close to me. Forgive the source none of the sources that are seen to be a little more credible have chosen to write on this issue (as far as i could see) they seem to want to hide it. I don't have any kids and this sure doesn't make me want them. Good luck to those that do.
    http://christiannews.net/2013/04/18/california-bathroom-bill-mandating-schools-to-allow-boys-in-girls-restrooms-approved-by-assembly/

    ReplyDelete
  8. yep still effects me
    http://www.wnd.com/2007/10/44009/

    ReplyDelete
  9. one last one i know you are tired of hearing from me
    http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2012/11/college-under-fire-for-allowing-transgender-female-to-use-womens-locker-room/

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ryan, as a parent I guess I have bigger concerns than co-ed bathrooms. I have enough faith in society's ability to discern appropriateness when it comes to males and females sharing or not sharing bathrooms. My bigger concern for my kids is that one of them will grow up and realize he/she is gay and will need understanding, love and support. I know I would put my kids above any social norm or religious belief that I have, but I don't know that society will. And if I feel that my own kids deserve that, then every other person's child also deserves it.
    As far as polygamy goes, no one is fighting for it...at least not hard enough. We already fought that fight in our nation and I think the outcome was satisfactory enough that we have found equilibrium. Since no one is agitating for it, it won't happen. Gay marriage isn't a slippery slope for every odd marriage practice to come into play. It is simply a fight for gay marriage. Polygamy wouldn't work in our culture in the modern world, and it doesn't promote gender equality which is the direction I believe we are headed in. So it just won't happen. But just because men aren't allowed to marry more than one woman, doesn't mean that gay people shouldn't be allowed to marry whomever they want. It's very very different. We don't know what the outcome of allowing gay marriage will be because we have no precedence for it. Sometimes society has to take that giant leap into the unknown in order to move forward. And if we make mistakes along the way, we will learn and grow and fix what needs to be fixed. Which is why I believe polygamy will never come back in our culture.

    ReplyDelete
  11. alright i have pretty much said my peace on this one but just remember not too long ago being gay was considered a psychological disorder and effected a very small percentage of society. I hate to tell you but Polygamy is still alive and thriving you might say it is working just working outside the law (cha cha says there are 50000 polygamist in the US compared to 160000 in 1990 when being gay wasnt popular). Find someone with enough money influence who knows what could happen. My biggest problem drop all society trends and put the two side by side. Gay marriage has always been toting "love is love", well is it or isn't it? I don't really see how gender equality is not there polygamy has its counterpart polyamory which does exist in modern day. Besides one might argue (and this agrument has changed society in may ways like the rise of pornography) they are two consenting adults (or in this case 3) and again love is love. You talk about the untraveled road and how we can never say that our pathway is harder or better or there pathway is wrong. I am not merely asking will society accept it but If I accept that "love is love" why doesn't that principle apply to polygamist as well? I could never support the idea that love is love but if i did my conscience would not let me overlook this sect merely because there numbers are not that great or society in its ridiculous wisdom has decided that freedom of choice doesn't apply to them because we don't understand them (sounds a lot like another arguement I have heard). No love is not love. By the way gender equality is a joke. It died the day that women decided they wanted everything that men are and have and neglected to celebrate the differences between us and embrace the strengths that come from being a woman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't worry about commenting too much. That's what this blog is for. I love the open conversation. The thing is, the fight for polygamy already existed in this country and it failed. I for one am grateful for that because I don't believe that polygamy engenders equality of the sexes. If it was just between two consenting adults it would be different, but there is so much manipulation and fear used to coerce women into these polygamous unions, and it starts with women in their early teens. Polygamy does a lot of damage to women. Polyandrous societies, the counterpart to polygamous societies, where women take more than one spouse are pretty much non-existent. Polyamory exists with women and men loving more than one partner, but that typically doesn't involve marriage anyway. I think the evolution of society involves survival of the fittest. Polygamists are growing in number compared to gay people for obvious reasons, but I don't hear them fighting to be heard or recognized by society and I don't see society accepting that form of marriage because polygamy itself is a flawed marriage system. That doesn't mean that I don't believe these unions can be and often are based on love. I think polygamists can make their marriages work just as well as anyone else. Polygamists are good people who have a valuable path to travel in life. I just don't care to have polygamy as an acceptable form of marriage in this country. History has shown that too much damage can be done by polygamy. Gay marriage however, is new in its fight for survival of the fittest. The gay population is rising, and I think it is because it is more acceptable to admit that you are gay now. So more people are willing to be who they really are more than ever before. I have not seen negative results from gay marriage yet like I see with polygamy. I really think that these issues are too different to compare them. People marry more than one spouse for very different reasons than people who want to marry someone of the same gender. I'm definitely not an expert though. Like I said, I can't understand what it is like to be gay and I also can't understand what it is like to be born into polygamy. I can only assimilate the information that I take in from others who experience those things.
      On a side note, I think women have been defined by men for so long that they are still trying to figure out how define themselves. Give us time.

      Delete
  12. Wow, I should have checked back sooner! Interesting conversation that has developed. First, I appreciate Jenny and Kim's responses to my first post. I can agree somewhat...I can abstractly, intellectually respect the path of someone who is causing harm. I can intellectually respect the path of, say, an evangelical conservative Christian who believes homosexuality is a sin. But on a personal, emotional, spiritual level...that path is actively harmful to me. It seeks to diminish my personhood, my identity, my very being. It categorizes me as "less than" other people. It considers my very existence to be a sin. I'm having a hard time putting this harm into words, but believe me, it is real. And ongoing.

    Should an abused woman respect the path her abuser is on? This may seem like too far of a stretch, but for some GLBT folks whose families or cultures are very anti-gay, it's not really an exaggeration. It's definitely in the same ballpark for many of us. I would answer this question negatively. There are some paths that, to me, do not merit respect. Or perhaps they merit respect only if a person is actively moving forward on that path, trying to change and grow. (If the abuser, for example, stopped drinking and started attending anger management classes, I could certainly respect that path.) A conservative Christian who is actively thinking about GLBT people, who is questioning received wisdom, who wonders about the individual people he/she knows...that person merits respect in my opinion. The person who refuses to reconsider received wisdom and refuses to acknowledge the pain caused by that wisdom...gets little respect from me (and little attention, little energy, or little compassion).

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ryan, I will accept your suggestion and use "white supremacist" rather than "redneck" in the future for this kind of argument. I appreciate you pointing that out.

    Secondly, though, I wonder why you say "I could never support the idea that love is love." Why not? It seems profoundly simple, deep, and Christian to me.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Sorry for the multiple postings, but I've been thinking more about this. I typically do have respect for people who have steadfast beliefs, who can hold strong to what they believe...but my respect is greatly heightened when those people are willing to examine and interrogate those beliefs. Now, one may question their belief system and end up believing the same things; it's the willingness to be intellectually open and searching that I most respect. I have no respect whatsoever for the Westboro Baptist Church. I have profound respect for former adherents of WBC, who have questioned that belief system, found it wanting, and left the church. Several of the founder's children have done so; they are still conservative Christians, most think homosexuality is a sin, still, but they have disavowed WBC's emphasis on hate and confrontation. To leave one's cultural, emotional, and spiritual home is deeply brave. I respect folks who are willing to seriously consider that, let alone follow through on it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Shannon, absolutely. I agree with you. I definitely don't think that we ever need to embrace actions by others that are harmful to ourselves or others. But I think a lot of people have beliefs that are hurtful to others and the hurt is unintentional. My religion has always been very important to me and I feel like I am one of those people who has had two signs pointing in different directions. On the one hand, my religion which makes order of life and eternity for me says that homosexuality is a sin. On the other hand, I feel something greater pulling me in the direction of seeing homosexuality as something more and embracing the chaos that will inevitably come into my perfectly ordered life by not looking at the world in black and white. By embracing it and other things that go against the current of my culture, I feel the same effect from the unintentional hurt of those who want the order, not the chaos. I know I have not felt it to the extent that you have and I feel so much pain for you because of the more horrible things people say and do to gay people. I think my post was meant more for people like me who are used to seeing the world in black and white and are having trouble adjusting their eyes to the colors of the rainbow. I definitely think it is easier to respect or at least to be open with people who are open and searching. But I'm trying really hard to respect and appreciate people who are not intellectually open too because I wasn't as open as I could have been until recently.

    ReplyDelete
  16. with all due respect i see that harm going both ways. Proposition 8 came around there was a vote. the vote was to ban it. what happened next a whole bunch of lds churches got sacked. what happened when prop 8 got thrown out the lds church sent out a letter and that was the end of that. now you retort that was just a few of the extremist and then I say the same principle applies to those christians that are focusing on hate and confrontation of you. There is a big difference between hate and disdain for you and a unwavering ethic that an action (notice i did not say the impulse) is wrong (probably in the same realm as pre-marital sex is considered to be by most christian groups). Dr. Martin Luther King said just a man by the content of his character not the color of his skin. I am kind of curious what now should I judge a man or woman by? You say i'm not hurting anyone else well a lot of people do drugs and it only hurts them.In fact some of the greatest music, art, and creations were created or thought of while on some sort of drug. Pretty sure that an arguement could be made to let everyone out of prison because it seems like everything is not harming anyone else or they were born with it and it is in there genes. Which dont get me wrong I do believe that people are born with tendencies, but I refuse to believe that as humans we cannot change our course EVERY COURSE. yes I do believe that if I wanted to I could turn myself gay. I could keep going on for several pages on morals, ethics and how everything is our choice but I wont. As far as love is love goes im not sure i can explain it very well with out offending many but here it goes. would you classify the love between a brother and sister the same as that between two spouses? how about that of a parent and child? pet owner and pet? I hope the answer is no, and thank goodness it is love is not love. You say those are very different situations. I answer really? because I don't see much different between two consenting adult siblings who love each other (because its all about love right and they do love each other) and two gay men. You say there is a chance they could have offspring and a lot of genetic disorders are much more likely to happen if its incest. I say gay men are much more likely to get aids and spread aids. sorry don't really see a difference. You ask me why is it your place to judge I would answer to you you are right its not my place to judge this ( i would say that goes with the incest and polygamy as well) untill you make it my plce by wanting gay marriage. As we all know marriage is societies acceptance and approval for the union of the couple. sorry i cannot accept or approve of when I see as a crime against nature. This seems like a good stopping point for now.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Love IS love. Just because it manifests in different ways does not make it invalid. Also, I think too often that people focus on sex as equating to love, when really they can, and often do, have nothing to do with each other. Just because you love something or someone does not mean that you want to have sex with them and vice versa. That's not to say that there isn't a place for sex in a loving relationship where two (or more) CONSENTING ADULTS have made that decision, I suppose that siblings could make that choice, but I really don't think that most people are genetically programmed for that. I think when those cases happen that there's more going on than we know about. The point is that if someone is gay or heterosexual and makes a choice to act on that, it is no one else's business and certainly not that of the government. Even more to the point, why do you care? The way you choose to live your life and the choices you make are no one else's business as long as you're not hurting anyone. I really have a difficult time understanding why people think they can impose their moral imperatives on others. Go to your church to do that, but don't make everyone else live by your standards. It's simply a matter of putting yourself in someone else's shoes. Would you like it if someone told you that you were not allowed to marry the woman that you wanted to? It's simply a matter of fairness. Also, not that it matters in this discussion, but most HIV cases are spread through heterosexual contact, usually from male to female. Also, can we just drop the judgement of others all together? Certainly we cannot allow people to hurt others, but I don't think we have to name-call in the process. Addressing these issues involves a commitment to finding a solution, not just screaming that the other side is wrong. This is not to say that I haven't done my share of name-calling. It's really frustrating when you can't seem to get your point across, of manage to figure out where the other person is coming from. It really is about love and a willingness to admit that we don't have all the answers, we don't always do our best to understand the other person's point of view and we don't always want to try. Let's really TRY.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I appreciate all the thoughtfulness that has gone into this post and the comments. In fact I admit I was a bit teary eyed. I loved the writing, but somewhere on my way through the comments I found myself tiring of the argument. I agree with a bit of what everyone has said but realize our bantering is never really going to solve our problem. So I turn to an ultimate source--God. I believe in God. I believe he has a moral code. I believe there is right and wrong. I believe that he is no respector of persons. I believe he loves all of his children. I believe he abhors hate. We all have sand in our lenses and no matter how hard we try to clean our glasses we can't possible see the future or be right about what is right or always wrong. We can guess, we can have intelectual argument, and we can try to be good natured and opened minded, and I believe we should do these things, but we are human and ultimately imperfect. I don't mean to splash any negativity on the human race, because I have great faith in people and hope in life and happiness for all. I also have no intent on making light of this matter because I believe this is important, and I believe it is important to do all in our power to clean our lenses. My point, God is the source of truth and light, and if we really want to know if something is Good or Bad, right or wrong, we need to ask him, because he knows, he loves us all, and he wants us to be happy. I know this doesn't work for everyone because many do not believe in God, but with all the argument, opinions, and anger, it gets confusing, and this is my source of truth. I am not talking about what one religion or another believes, or what one political group or another believes, or what my neighbors believe. I am speaking of an individual conversation with God. I can research the subject scientifically, I can hear oppossing views, and still be wrong. I want to know what is right and what is true one way or the other. Until now, I have had my opinions and let the subject be, but you have all inspired me to search a bit deeper and rely on something greater.

    ReplyDelete